The great Gardasil debate
Cervical cancer vaccine Gardasil could do more damage than good for young women.
BY Lynda Wharton | Mar 11, 2009

In the past few weeks I have had many patients and friends talk to me about the HPV (cervical cancer) Gardasil vaccine which is currently being rolled out in New Zealand schools.

Concerned mums of young girls are asking me: "should I vaccinate my daughter?"

In truth, that's a question that every mum must decide for herself, and to do so in any kind of informed way involves looking much further than the standard information available on the government websites.

To make an "informed consent" involves investigating the growing concerns relating to both the safety and efficacy of this vaccine - something that simply won't occur if you only read the glossy consent forms sent home with your daughter.

You don't have to guess which side of the Gardasil fence I stand. I'll tell you from the outset that my daughters will not be receiving Gardasil. I have written four extensive articles on Gardasil which necessitated many hours of research. What I discovered, greatly unsettled me.

From my perspective the big pharmaceutical PR machines are working overtime on this one. Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil, has a great deal riding on the success of this projected blockbuster.

Their previous blockbuster, the anti inflammatory drug Vioxx, was also promoted as being "safe and effective".

To date Merck has paid US$5 billion as a result of litigation from families who lost their loved ones after taking Vioxx. Analysts now attribute somewhere between 150,000 and 200,000 deaths to Vioxx use.

Don't be panicked into believing that cervical cancer will kill your daughter if she doesn't have this vaccine. The truth is that the incidence of cervical cancer is greatly in the decline in the west. In New Zealand for example around 160 cases are diagnosed annually, with a death rate of around 60 women per year. (That's about 2.5 cases per 100,000 women).

Most of these women could have lived if their cancer had been caught in the early precancer stages, through regular pap smears. While it's true that extremely aggressive cervical cancer can grow and kill in the two to three year gap between smears, this is rare.

Remember too that we already know the ways in which our daughters can protect themselves from cervical cancer. These include abstaining from cigarette smoking; practicing safe sex with condoms; limiting the number of sexual partners; eating a nutritious diet containing plenty of antioxidants, folate and selenium; and never skipping a pap smear.

The concerns regarding Gardasil are far too many to look at in this brief blog. So I'll raise just one issue...is this vaccine safe? The Merck website and government sites will assure you that it is, but dig a little deeper and the anxiety levels begin to rise.

The American Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) has had almost 11,000 notifications filed on Gardasil adverse events in America alone. While many of these are related to local soreness, dizziness and fainting, many others report serious life threatening events. Globally there are now 27 deaths reported to have occurred within a short period after Gardasil vaccination.

The American National Vaccine Information centre last year compared adverse events reported after Gardasil and the Menactra (Meningococcal) vaccine administered to girls of around the same age.

They found up to 30 times more notifications of serious adverse events after Gardasil.

They also found that, compared to Menactra, Gardasil is associated with at least twice as many emergency room visit reports (5021); four times as many death reports (29); five times as many "did not recover" reports (2017) and seven times as many "disabled" reports (261).

There have been 34 reports of thrombosis (clots which stay in a blood vessel at the site of its formation); 27 reports of lupus (a chronic autoimmune disorder); 23 reports of blood clots, 16 reports of stroke and 11 reports of vasculitis (inflammation of blood vessels) following Gardasil given alone.

There are three to six times more reports of fainting after Gardasil versus Menactra and there have been 544 reports of seizures following Gardasil.

Based on their research the National Vaccine Information Centre has warned that Gardasil appears to be highly reactive. They have asked for federal health agencies to inform physicians and parents about serious health problems associated with the new vaccine...to date this has not happened.

Lynda Wharton is a health and wellbeing writer, columnist and author. She also practises as an acupuncturist and naturopath.

lynda@lyndawharton.com

www.lyndawharton.com


PAGE: PREV NEXT SHOW ON ONE PAGE
 
 
 
0
*1
Charly Draper
3/20/2009 11:25:17 AM
Vaccines have revolutionised the modern way of life - preventing our close living conditions from spreading disease in the way it did in previous centuries. Sadly, some people are now so used to this healthy way of life that they appear to have forgotten how we achieved such a healthy society. Of course, if every other child in your kid's class is vaccinated, your child is highly unlikely to get sick, as no-one around them will get sick. However, this selfish way of looking at it means we now have diseases believed "eradicated" again on the rise. Having said that, of course not all vaccines will be worth taking, but this article does not provide any examples of why/how this vaccine is not a good idea, simply relying on instilling doubt. Can Lynda at least provide links to her peer-reviewed articles regarding the problems with Gardasil?
0
*1
Laureen O'Brien
3/20/2009 10:01:08 AM
Thank you for spreading the word on this and other vaccines! As a new mum I researched vaccinations extensively - wanting to make an informed choice - and was shocked and dismayed by what I discovered. As a result I have never vaccinated my children in any form. I worked at a hospital at the time and I took a lot of flack from everyone, including my boss, when they found out I was against vaccinations. But I stuck to my guns and have been blessed with extremely healthy children who rarely catch even a cold. Every time their "whole class" comes down with something, it skips my kids entirely.
0
*1
Sarah Williams
3/18/2009 1:38:07 PM
This sounds suspiciously like the meningicocal vaccines. My daughter suffered from an adverse reaction at the time of her first injection and nobody would even acknowledge it a possible adverse reaction. It seemed the medical profession was too scared to record such things. I wonder how many other cases like mine were never recorded?
0
*1
Rebecca Lamb
3/13/2009 8:25:51 PM
Lynda, thanks for your enlightening comments on the Gardasil vaccine. I think the way that this is being positioned through schools to young women in NZ implies that there is an expectation that they should have the vaccine and for many parents it will be 'just another form' they have to sign. Informed consent can only happen when all the information is presented, but (and this is true of all vaccines promoted in NZ), the benefits are hugely talked up and the risks and limitations are glossed over. Parents need to search out the information themselves, and I have found the Immunisation Awareness Society's website (http://www.ias.org.nz/) very useful in this respect. But how many parents know this additional information exists if they are not made aware of it's existence when the pro vaccination fact sheets that come home don't point them in that direction? How many parents are going to take the time to make informed consent? It certainly seems like an 'opt out' campaign is being run for Gardasil, when it should be 'opt in'.
 
SHOWING IMAGE: 1
Lynda Wharton


issues
Subscribe



Web Design & Development By Web Site Designed By Net Starter